|
By Michael Geist 2/2/10 With the conclusion of the 7th round of ACTA negotiations in Guadalajara, Mexico last week, participating countries issued the now-standard boilerplate statement that merely repeats the agenda items and provides no real insight into the progress of the talks. While the statement is does little to advance the desire for greater transparency, reports from New Zealand and Sweden shed far more light on where things stand. The key points: * The U.S. proposal for Internet enforcement has received considerable
public attention, yet there are three proposals on the table that address
digital enforcement and safe harbours (ie. intermediary liability). One
of New Zealand's negotiators reports that a fourth proposal is currently
being formulated and that it could take six more months before this chapter
is settled. |
![]() Michael Geist |
Dr. Michael Geist is
a law professor at the University of Ottawa where he holds the Canada Research
Chair of Internet and E-commerce Law. as written numerous academic articles
and government reports on the Internet and law and is a columnist on technology
law issues